Chris Christie, A CONSERVATIVE MYTH EXPOSED

Back in another lifetime, when I lived in the socialist State of New Jersey, I was one of the founders of a website called “Conservative New Jersey.”  I will reprint a series of articles we did on Christie, hoping it will convince the good people of the Free Republic of South Carolina to say NO to him.

In this final article of the series, we looked at the Deep-Fried Couch Potato summed up all of the previous research we had done and the conclusion we reached, which is Chris Christie was not then or before we was elected governor, a conservative.  As time goes on, he continues to be the progressive liberal that has been his hallmark during his lifetime.   I apologize once again for the non-functional links and the inability to show you videos that have now become private.   With time, everything changes, except Chris Christie; he has always been a RINO, and he will never change.

Prefatory Note: This is the final installment of our series on Governor Chris Christie. Toward the end of this post you will find the list of our main criticisms of Mr. Christie that appeared in the introductory post; each item in this list contains a link to the appropriate article containing the references that support our case. If there is any one post in this series that you link to on your own blog or Facebook page or send to friends and family, let it be this one.

It appears that Mr. Christie has become a “rock star” whose political stock went through the roof after his debut on YouTube. Republicans and Tea Party patriots nationwide flock to him as the second coming of Ronald Reagan – a conservative crusader who took on the unions and balanced New Jersey’s budget by slashing spending and vetoing any tax increases; a tough-talking, take-charge leader who will guide the Garden State to the land of political milk and honey.

We at Conservative New Jersey have observed this “Christiemania” with a mixture of puzzlement, amusement and ultimately alarm because we understand New Jersey and we have carefully studied Mr. Christie’s entire political career – one characterized at the beginning by breathtaking ambition and rancorous battles with fellow Republicans.

It is a matter of record that in the 1990s Mr. Christie was decidedly in favor of abortion rights – but became pro-life after the birth of his first child in 1995. In spite of the fact that his Lieutenant Governor and Attorney-General both favor abortion rights, we’ll take his word for it.

Mr. Christie proudly pointed out that as U.S. Attorney he “put 10% of the New Jersey State Senate behind bars” and bragged about his flawless record as a crusader against crime in the Garden State, pointing out that of the 160+ scoundrels he prosecuted, everyone was brought to justice.

Not quite. There is the case of former Passaic County Republican Party Chairman Peter Murphy, who Christie claims as one of the bad guys he bagged.  It turns out that Murphy was actually convicted by Christie’s predecessor – but the conviction was overturned by the courts. After Christie assumed office as the U.S. Attorney, a new trial for Murphy was scheduled but in a plea-bargain arrangement with Mr. Christie, Murphy pleaded guilty in exchange for time already served. He eventually became the GOP municipal chairman for the borough of Totowa and, mirabile dictu, supported Mr. Christie for Governor.

Then there is the awful Union City Sex Slave Case. In 2005 Christie’s office indicted Luisa Medrano as the “ringleader” of a sex slave operation involving thirty female immigrants – many of whom were 14 years old and younger and all of whom were here illegally. The women and girls were brutally treated and forced to undergo abortions if they became pregnant. In one instance, one of the girls managed to give birth, but the infant was drowned in a toilet.

If convicted on all charges, Medrano would have faced 250 years in prison. Five months after the indictment, Mr. Christie declared “Human trafficking, to me, is one of the most horrible things that can happen, one of the most anti-American things that can happen.”

If you think Medrano is rotting in prison as you read this, think again.

Chris Christie was building a record of political convictions, and the “ring leader” had given cash gifts to a local mayor in return for having her paperwork expedited and other favorable treatment at town hall.

A plea deal was negotiated with Christie’s office. The “ring leader” testified against the mayor. Most of the charges against her were dropped and she received no jail time for her crimes. She was ordered to pay the more than $500,000 she owed in back taxes on profits from her operation. The mayor, who had received a few thousand dollars in gifts, was sentenced to more than 4 years in prison.

Makes sense, right? Why incarcerate a monster in prison for life when you can score partisan points by nailing a penny ante pezzonovante Democrat with a four year stint in the hoosegow?

Then there is the 2009 Republican primary for Governor. No sooner had he given the hint that he might consider running for office than the folks at NJN managed to corner him for a brief Q&A in December of 2008:

It was a little over three minutes of some of the most exquisite political fandango we ever witnessed. Mr. Christie was unable to give a straight answer to ANY of the questions posed to him. When asked if he is a conservative Republican or a moderate Republican, he responded:

What I am is somebody who has always been committed to the best in public life and I think…again…all these labels and the things that people try to do when they’re playing politics demean public debate. If any candidate presents themselves for office, I would suggest that people shouldn’t judge them by the labels that anybody puts on them. They should judge them by the words that come out of their mouths and the actions and deeds that underlie their political and public career.

Honestly: can you imagine Ronald Reagan – at any point ever in his political career as a Republican – being this verbosely evasive?

On the other hand, you can cut the irony with a chain saw, insofar as we have taken Mr. Christie’s admonition to heart and judged him by the words that came out of his mouth and the actions and deeds that underlie his political and public career.

It is said that a tree falls in the direction it leans and we certainly knew which direction the tree called Ronaldus Magnus was leaning when it fell on June 5, 2004. Can anyone – ANYONE – tell us with any certainty the direction in which the tree called Christi Gubernator is leaning?

Perhaps this campaign video from 2009 will give us a clue:

Ah yes, nothing like the soothing words and soaring rhetoric of Barack Hussein Obama to give us warm fuzzies about working together in bipartisan unity and electing Chris Christie Governor of New Jersey.

Mr. Christie himself echoed President Obama in yet another campaign video in which he tells us that “New Jersey’s problems are too big to be solved with one party solutions, whether its school choice, green energy or  revitalizing our cities. We’ll need good ideas from both sides. If you want partisan politics as usual, well, I’m not your guy.”

How is it possible to get good ideas from both sides when the ideas of the Democrats are primarily responsible for the wretched situation in which we find New Jersey and the nation? Precisely which good Democrat ideas could Governor Christie implement to save the Garden State from a destructive course set by Democrats…and those Republicans who think like them?

Before answering, consider the evidence we have examined in great detail in the course of this series and review it once more:

  • His budget passed only after three conservative Republicans were bullied into voting for it and the savings achieved in the budget were done at the expense of new taxes, new fees, federal Stimulus funds and accounting gimmicks; the 2% property tax cap will actually cause taxes to skyrocket; he has yet to propose the “across the board” tax cuts he promised as a candidate; the budget actually INCREASES state expenditures by 6% and the number of staff in the Governor’s office making $100,000 per year increases by ten;
  • His confrontation with the unions is pure Kabuki theater with nothing accomplished but acrimony; he has yet to lay off a single state employee and his proposed 2011 state worker reduction plan is little more than window dressing;
  • He has populated his cabinet with notorious liberals while firing the only true conservative – after slandering him;
  • He has endorsed notorious RINO candidates in the 2010 mid-term election while avoiding (with one notable exception) contact with conservative candidates;
  • He supports a multi-state Cap & Trade scheme known as the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and is so committed to Cap & Trade that he used funds raised from RGGI’s carbon auctions to help balance the budget; he has directed that state funds be appropriated to subsidize “green” technology ventures such as off-shore windmills;
  • He has refused to join other state attorneys-general in a joint lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Obamacare while accepting federal funds for the implementation of a similar program on a statewide level;
  • He is on record saying that he does not believe illegal aliens are here illegally; he has indicated that he supports amnesty for illegals; he generally favors strict gun control and he supports construction of the Ground Zero Mosque even as he condemns those who oppose it.

Then there is candidate Christie’s 2009 video love letter to Barack Obama in which he invokes the likes of Bruce Springsteen – who refuses to go gently into that good retirement and for the past two decades has publicly expressed nothing but contempt for everything that conservative Republicans hold dear.

Apparently, Mr. Christie’s overtures were not lost on many of New Jersey’s Obamabots, who appear to have an affinity for any candidate who repeats vapid, vacuous “Hope and Change” mantras:

While it is true that you can tell a lot about a man by his enemies, you can also tell a lot about a man by those who call him a friend – or in this case, who cast their votes for him.

We agree with columnist Charles Stile: Chris Christie has very cleverly co-opted the anger, the energy, the momentum – and, most importantly, the donor lists – of numerous conservative organizations and Tea Party groups without seriously committing to the conservative cause apart from bluster, bravado and nicely crafted soundbites.  Any actual “conservative” acts or deeds on his part amount to little more than politically acceptable sops and window dressing that enable him to continue basking in the worshipful glow of Beck, Hannity and other prominent members of the conservative movement who, in the final analysis, are less admirers than enablers.

Does this mean that Chris Christie is the worst Governor we could have elected? Not at all, and, as we observed in other posts in this series, there are many laudable things he has done. A commenter named DiMarco summed up our position elegantly:

Is Christie the best Governor New Jersey has had in decades? Absolutely! However, just because the rotting apple smells better than the rotting banana which smells better than the rotten egg which smells better than a pile of excrement does not mean you should wear it as perfume.

The main point of the series (and it is a series) is that Christie is not the conservative that many in the media portray him to be and that many people believe he is. Each part of the series highlights various aspects of Christie’s administration and proves with facts that he is not a true conservative but more of a moderate with some liberal tendencies.

As for those people who referred to Christie’s efforts on behalf of some conservative campaigns, I have a question: Did he do so during any of the primaries – when the voters had to choose between a conservative and a party-backed RINO?

It is entirely possible that given the remarkable shift in the direction of the political winds, Gov. Christie will fine tune his message to make it one more easily ingested and digested by a Republican base starved for Reagan conservatism. If so, we can only urge caution and two axioms by which to assess him:

First: a tree really does fall in the direction it leans. Unless and until you study Mr. Christie’s past, you cannot begin to understand him in the present – much less anticipate what he’ll do in the future.

Second: actions really do speak far louder than words. Mr. Christie is adept at telling people what they want to hear – not what he is actually doing or what he really believes. Ignore what he says and concentrate on what he actually does.

In dealing with the Soviet Empire, President Reagan assured the American people that he would “trust but verify.” We implore the electorate in both New Jersey and America to do no less when considering Governor Christopher J. Christie as a conservative candidate for ANY office.

Posted in America, Chesterfield County South Carolina, National Security, Republican Primary, RINO, South Carolina, South Carolina Republican Party | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Chris Christie, A CONSERVATIVE MYTH EXPOSED

Your Morning Cup of Ramirez

Posted in Morning Cup of Ramirez | Tagged | Comments Off on Your Morning Cup of Ramirez

Chris Christie, Don’t Buy What He is Selling Part 7

Back in another lifetime, when I lived in the socialist State of New Jersey, I was one of the founders of a website called “Conservative New Jersey.”  I will reprint a series of articles we did on Christie, hoping it will convince the good people of the Free Republic of South Carolina to say NO to him.

In Part 7 of the series, we looked at the Tub of Pork and his positions on illegal aliens, Second Amendment rights, and arab reaction to 9-11.  I apologize if most of the links are non-functional now.   With time, everything changes, except Chris Christie; he has always been a RINO, and he will never change.

Myth #7: Gov. Christie strongly opposes illegal immigration, gun control and the Ground Zero Mosque.

Here are the facts: Just the opposite is true for every one of these issues.

Illegal Immigration

In late April of 2008, at church forum sponsored by the local chapter of the Latino Leadership Alliance of New Jersey, Mr. Christie assured his audience that illegal immigrants were not really here illegally, but were simply “undocumented.”

“Being in this country without proper documentation is not a crime,” Christie told more than 60 residents and town officials. “The whole phrase of ‘illegal immigrant’ connotes that the person, by just being here, is committing a crime.”

“Don’t let people make you believe that that’s a crime that the U.S. Attorney’s Office should be doing something about,” he added of entering the country illegally. “It is not.”

Mr. Christie later tried to clarify his statement, but CNN’s Lou Dobbs would have none of it. According to correspondent Bill Tucker:

Now it’s perhaps worth noting that Christie doesn’t have a strong record on prosecuting immigration violations. From 2002 through 2007, we could only find 13 cases of immigration cases that were prosecuted.

We called Christie’s office; they would not help us with a better count. They told us they have got 150 lawyers; they don’t have the time to track all of this. So we went through their press releases and got 13. Compare that to the U.S. attorney in Kansas who was much more helpful. That office provided us with a list of their immigration case load in that same time period and Lou, 597 cases in Kansas from 2002 to 2007.

At that church meeting, Mr. Christie claimed that he supports more border security but added that “certain leaders around the state that have demagogued on this issue” are “ill-informed.”

It was a gratuitous swipe at Morristown Mayor Donald Cresitello – a conservative Democrat who pushed hard in 2007 for his municipality to be granted 287(g) status that would permit local cops to be deputized as federal immigration officers with the power to apprehend and turn over to ICE agents any illegal aliens undocumented immigrants they discovered.

At about the time that Mr. Christie was publicly berating Mayor Crisitello for “grandstanding,” news broke of the shooting deaths of four students in a Newark school yard by members of a gang led by an illegal immigrant from Peru who had been arrested the year before on an assault charge and then released. Newark is located in Essex County – which had thus far refused to apply for 287(g) status.

Oops. I wonder how long it took for County Prosecutor (and future state AG) Paula Dow, county leaders and U.S Attorney Chris Christie to wipe the egg from their faces.

As late as July of this year it appears that Gov. Christie has doubled down on his position:

On the hot-button topic of immigration reform, he said he has long declined to “demagogue” the issue as a former U.S. Attorney, because “I come from law enforcement and it’s not an easy issue.”

But he did intimate that he thinks stringent state-by-state laws – such as in Arizona – are the wrong approach, and added, “I think President Obama doesn’t do this at his own risk because it’s affecting the economy in the country…to me, I think the president’s really gotta show the leadership on this.”

“This is a federal problem, it’s gotta have a federal fix,” he said. “I’m not really comfortable with state law enforcement having a big role.”

He said that without border security, enforcement of existing laws and a “clear” path to legalization for immigrants, there would never be a fix.

Ben Smith of Politico provided a bit more detail on Christie’s comments:

“What I support is making sure that the federal government [plays] each and every one of its roles: Securing the border, enforcing immigration laws, and having an orderly process — whatever that process is — for people to gain citizenship.”

He added: “It’s a very easy issue to demagogue and I’m just not going to participate in that.”

Christie said more resources — specifically, “money” — were needed to support federal law enforcement and border security, along with “having a clear understandable law that people can follow.”

“Until you have both of those…you’re not going to fix the problem,” he said.

Christie also said he thinks state and local law enforcement don’t have appropriate training to enforce immigration laws, and that it can distract from their overriding goal of keeping the public safe.

“Keeping the public safe.” You know…what the Newark constabulary could have done if it had the authority to apprehend the illegal alien undocumented immigrant who directed the schoolyard murder of four students. That kind of public safety.

The ostensibly conservative Governor Christie also opposes Arizona’s effort to do what the federal government is supposed to be doing – protecting itself from a continual incursion across its borders with Mexico. Rather strange – in light of the fact that most conservatives support the law while most liberals oppose it, no?

Then there is the matter of a “clear path to legalization for immigrants.” It doesn’t take extensive parsing to tease out what he means: a path to legalization does not need to be extended to immigrants who are here legally, but to those who are here…um…illegally. What would such a path entail? There is only thing we can think of: amnesty. And the result? Heh… “an orderly process for people to gain citizenship.”

Goodness gracious…it appears that everyone’s favorite conservative rock star shares the stage with Alpha RINOs John McCain and Lindsey Graham. Ouch.

Gun Control

Mr. Christie strongly supported the assault weapons ban enacted during the Clinton administration. In a campaign flyer circulated during his 1995 campaign, he attacked his opponents’ support for repealing the ban:

As the gubernatorial campaign commenced in June  last year, Michael Symons of the Asbury Park Press reported that:

Chris Christie supports the assault weapons ban and all current gun laws. He opposes attempts to permit conceal and carry laws in New Jersey – hardly the NRA position.

In August 2009, then Governor Jon Corzine signed into law a restrictive gun control measure that limited handgun purchases to one per month – legislation that Republican Candidate Chris Christie is on record as opposing.

However, that tune changed abruptly soon after Gov. Christie took office:

Just one day after being sworn in, the newly appointed state Attorney General [Paula Dow] took the most aggressive legal posture available to defend former Governor Corzine’s one-gun-a-month handgun rationing law, moving to dismiss ANJRPC’s lawsuit to overturn the law, and later vigorously opposing ANJRPC’s motion for a preliminary injunction in the case. The U.S. District Court could hear argument on these motions as soon as April.

This is the first indication of the new Attorney General’s posture on the firearms issue. Despite the unanimous opposition of Senate republicans and several prominent democrats when this legislation was rammed through by one vote in the middle of the night last June, the Attorney General has chosen to aggressively defend the largely ineffective law, which can be easily thwarted by criminals and fails to punish criminal behavior, but which clearly tramples the rights of honest citizens…”

In an October 27  interview with Sean Hannity, Gov. Christie admitted that he favors gun control.

Christie: We have a densely populated state and there’s a big handgun problem in New Jersey. Now, I don’t support all the things that the governor supports, by a long stretch. But on certain gun control issues, looking at it from a law enforcement perspective, seeing how many police officers were killed — we have an illegal gun problem in New Jersey.

Hannity: Should every citizen in your state be allowed to get a licensed weapon if they want one?

Christie: In New Jersey, that’s not going to happen, Sean.

Hannity: Why?

Christie: Listen, with the Democratic Legislature that we have, there is no way those type of things –

Hannity: Would you support it.”

Christie: Listen, at the end of the day, what I support are common sense laws that will allow people to protect themselves. But I also am very concerned about the safety of our police officers on the streets. Very concerned. And I want to make sure that we don’t have an abundance of guns out there.

So much for a stalwart, solidly conservative defense of the Second Amendment. How’s that rock star status holding up so far?

Ground Zero Mosque

What better way to wrap up this traipse through quasi-conservative fantasyland but a stop at Cordoba House – aka The Ground Zero Mosque? During the summer the media reported on a proposal to construct a 13-story Islamic community center two blocks’ distance from Ground Zero. Dubbed “The Ground Zero Mosque,” it became the nexus of a controversy involving those who opposed the construction of the mosque on ground made “hallowed” by the September 11 attack and those who argued that opposing the construction was tantamount to religious persecution of Muslims.

According to the official website for the Cordoba Initiative:

It will be a multi-floor community center open to all New Yorkers, much like a YMCA or Jewish Community Center (JCC) with a designated prayer space (mosque) in one area to serve the needs of the large existing community of American Muslims in the neighborhood.

Strictly speaking, that makes it a cultural center cum mosque. Whatever the designation, the plan to build it in that precise location has a lot of people upset – and for two very good reasons: first, those who hijacked the airliners that crashed into the Twin Towers were jihadist Muslims who did so in the name of Allah and of Islam and the horror of that day of infamy is still fresh in the memories of the families who lost loved ones.

Second, many opponents of the GZM see it as a national security threat. Given the increasing number of jihadists and centers of jihadist activity occurring on our own soil, it is not unreasonable to be suspicious of any and every mosque, madrassah or Islamic cultural center.  Allowing them to build a recruiting center at the scene of their greatest triumph is not something that just offends the sensitivities of the victims’ families, it is a potential direct threat against New York, New Jersey and the rest of America.

What was Governor Christie’s take on all this? If you guessed that he perched himself comfortably on the fence and stuck a moistened finger in the air, you win a cigar:

“Given my last position, that I was the first U.S. attorney post-9/11 in New Jersey, I understand acutely the pain and sorrow and upset of the family members who lost loved ones that day at the hands of radical Muslim extremists,” Christie said. “And their sensitivities and concerns have to be taken into account. Just because it’s nearly nine years later, those sensitivities cannot and should not be ignored.

“On the other hand, we cannot paint all of Islam with that brush. … We have to bring people together. And what offends me the most about all this, is that it’s being used as a political football by both parties. And what disturbs me about the president’s remarks is that he is now using it as a political football as well. I think the president of the United States should rise above that. And should not be using this as a political football, and I don’t believe that it would be responsible of me to get involved and comment on this any further because it just put me in the same political arena as all of them.”

How’s that for a powerful statement of conservative principle? Except that it isn’t.

Governor Christie did nothing more than seize the rhetorical middle. By characterizing both the Republicans and the Democrats as somehow wrong for getting involved in the debate, he gives the appearance of occupying the moral high ground – even as he avers that critics of the GZM are worse than the proponents because they are overreacting and painting Islam with a radical tar brush. His position closely parallels that of NYC Mayor Bloomberg – who was even more strident in his condemnation of the GZM critics.

All Governor Christie has done is weasel out of taking sides on a contentiously divisive issue. This isn’t the behavior of a conservative statesman…it’s the behavior of a typical politician with one eye on the polls and the other on the Presidential election of 2012.

One final question for any remaining cheerleaders: more ice for your Chriservative Kool-Aid?

****************************************************

In Chris Christie: A Conservative Myth Exposed we will summarize our case against the shibboleth that Governor Chris Christie is a conservative Republican in the mold of Ronald Reagan.

Posted in America, Chesterfield County South Carolina, Republican Primary, RINO, South Carolina, South Carolina Republican Party | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Chris Christie, Don’t Buy What He is Selling Part 7